Federal Crimes

White Collar Crime at a Crossroads: The Implications of Kousisis on Federal Fraud

Published on: December 16, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

This month, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kousisis v. United States, a case that could have significant implications on the future of federal white-collar prosecutions. Specifically, the Court is considering the boundaries of federal fraud statutes in scenarios where deceptive practices are employed without causing direct financial harm to the victim.

Kousisis comes before the Court after a Philadelphia-area government contractor was found guilty of fraud after it failed to comply with a contract provision intended to promote diversity. Stamatios Kousisis and Alpha Painting and Construction Co., Inc. (Alpha) secured two substantial contracts with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). These contracts mandated a certain percentage of work to be allocated to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs). Kousisis and his company misrepresented their compliance with this requirement by using a DBE as a mere pass-through entity, thereby falsely claiming adherence to the DBE participation goals. Despite this deception, the contracted work was completed to PennDOT’s satisfaction, and no direct financial loss was incurred by the department.

Federal prosecutors charged Kousisis and Alpha with wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and making false statements. The prosecution’s argument was based on the “fraudulent inducement” theory, suggesting that the defendants obtained the contracts through deceptive promises, even though PennDOT did not suffer a financial loss. Ultimately, Kousisis was sentenced to 70 months’ imprisonment for the multi-million dollar fraud he perpetrated following a jury trial in 2018.

Gautam Adani and 5 others charged with Bribery and SEC fraud in the EDNY

Published on: November 30, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

A five count indictment was unsealed this past week in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of New York. The federal court in Brooklyn charged Gautam S. Adani, Sagar R. Adani and Vneet S. Jaain, executives of an Indian renewable-energy company, with conspiracies to commit securities and wire fraud and Securities Fraud for their roles in a billion dollar scheme to obtain funds from U.S. investors and global financial institutions on the basis of false and misleading statements.

The indictment also charges Ranjit Gupta and Rupesh Agarwal, former executives of a renewable-energy company with securities that had traded on the New York Stock Exchange, and Cyril Cabanes, Saurabh Agarwal and Deepak Malhotra, former employees of a Canadian institutional investor, with conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in connection with a bribery scheme also perpetrated by Gautam S. Adani, Sagar R. Adani and Vneet S. Jaain, involving one of the world’s largest solar energy projects.

The indictment alleges that more than $250 Million in bribes were promised to secure solar enery contracts worth 2 billion dollars over two decades.

P2P Applications and Child Pornography

Published on: November 2, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

As we explained in our prior post about federal child pornography laws, the consequences of a child pornography or CSAM (“Child Sexual Abuse Material”) conviction are severe and life-altering. And the collateral consequence of being on the sex offender registry can be devastating.

Early on, Conaway & Strickler defended cases that stemmed from activity on classic peer-to-peer applications like Limewire. These type of networks were simply software applications that provided a central hub for various computers to connect. Napster, for example, was a peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing service that allowed users to share and download music files from other users’ computers. These types of programs were utilized to distribute music, movies and child pornography. Law enforcement was able to track those cases more easily.

Today, however, the government has also become well versed in programs like BitTorrent, Limewire and e-Donkey, among others. When a hard drive or device is analyzed by the government, they now will produce a report detailing their forensic examination. They will detail all of the evidence found on the device showing evidence of P2P Networking, search history, bookmarks and they even cite images or image fragments found in cache locations. Here is a recent example of a federal criminal prosecution of someone who downloaded images from the BitTorrent Network.

Paycheck Protection Program Enforcement Continues

Published on: October 25, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

As discussed in our prior blogs, the Department of Justice has already been prosecuting cases of larger-scale, outright PPP fraud. In August 2022, President Biden signed two bills into law that give the Department of Justice and other federal agencies more time to investigate and prosecute Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) cases. H.R. 7352, the “PPP and Bank Fraud Enforcement Harmonization Act of 2022” and H.R. 7334, the “COVID-19 EIDL Fraud Statute of Limitations Act of 2022” extend the statute of limitations for fraud charges involving PPP and EIDL fraud to ten years. This has allowed the government more time to prosecute these cases. And they continue to do so with increasing frequency. Recently the government was involved in prosecuting this covid-19 related schemes,

In investigating PPP loan fraud, the government first looks at the application itself. How many employees does the company have? Does that number match their payroll tax filings? Are the 941‘s the same as what is on file at the IRS? Has the owner(s) been convicted of or pled guilty to a felony with the past 5 years? Do the bank statements submitted on the PPP loan application match the actual bank statements? Are there business expenses on the bank statements? Was the bank account in a business checking account? When was the entity created? Did the company apply for more than one loan? Does the individual owner have multiple entities and apply for multiple loans? Any inaccurate statements on the application can result in a charge under Under 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (bank fraud) – making false statements to an FDIC-insured financial institution, or making false statements to the SBA. In addition, the CARES Act also has requirements for how companies use, and account for the use of, PPP loan funds. Some of the more outrageous PPP loan fraud prosecutions have resulted due to individuals buying Range Rovers, Lamborghinis and rolex watches with PPP loan proeeeds, i.e. converting PPP loan funds for personal use. Also, when seeking forgiveness for loans, companies must be very careful in what they submit. Any false documentation submitted can result in prosecution.

So, should the government be inquiring about your PPP loan(s) or EIDL loans or any disaster relief funds, it is important to contact us immediately. Being evasive or being unable to produce documentation of PPP Compliance will only increase issues that you will be facing. Allow Conaway & Strickler, PC to help you with expert advice from experienced federal counsel. We are very familiar with the federal criminal investigative process with the SBA-OIG, IRS and the DOJ.

Criminal Consequences for Unruly Airline Passengers: The FAA’s Push for Prosecution

Published on: October 5, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

In recent years, unruly behavior on flights has become a growing concern, prompting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to escalate its enforcement efforts. Since 2021, the FAA has referred over 310 cases of severe incidents to the FBI for criminal prosecution. These cases involve dangerous acts like physical assaults, attempts to breach the cockpit, and sexual misconduct, all of which have serious legal consequences.

The FAA’s zero-tolerance policy, implemented in 2021, marked a shift from warnings to immediate enforcement. With incidents like physical assaults on passengers and crew members, the FAA has consistently referred the most egregious cases to the FBI. The FAA can impose civil penalties up to $37,000 per violation, but when these cases are referred for criminal prosecution, offenders face much harsher outcomes.

In 2023, over 1,240 incidents of unruly passenger behavior were reported. Of those, 43 cases were referred to the FBI for criminal prosecution due to their severity. These cases often involve physical altercations or inappropriate behavior that pose a threat to the safety of everyone on board. The FAA’s clear stance on holding individuals accountable shows that passengers who engage in such behavior will face serious repercussions.You can read more about the FAA’s referral process and efforts in their official statement and in further detail from FAA’s unruly passenger policy page.

The New FINCEN Rule for Residential Real Estate: What it Means for Investors and Legal Compliance

Published on: September 18, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

Recently, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN) issued a pivotal final rule aimed at tightening regulatory oversight in the residential real estate sector. This change marks a significant step towards enhancing transparency in an industry that has, until now, been relatively free from such regulatory scrutiny. Generally, the new rule requires certain real estate professionals to report information about non-financed transfers of residential real estate to legal entities or trusts.

What Is the New FINCEN Rule?

FINCEN’s new rule extends Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) obligations to investment advisers involved in residential real estate transactions. The aim is to prevent illicit financial activities in an industry known for large cash transactions that can serve as vehicles for money laundering, fraud, and other financial crimes.

When Can Law Enforcement Search my Cell Phone?

Published on: September 14, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

Cell phones are everywhere today and thus play a significant role in criminal investigations.

What reports are generated from my devices?

Cellebrite reports provide information about phone calls and text messages; but now it also provides a report on the data stored on these devices such as voicemails, images, and browsing history. From GPS location data to social media activity, cell phones can provide a treasure trove for law enforcement agencies to use to build their cases.

Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs): What Triggers Them and How to Respond

Published on: September 13, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

In the world of banking and finance, the term “Suspicious Activity Report” (SAR) may sound intimidating—especially if you’ve been notified that a bank has filed one concerning your transactions. For individuals and businesses alike, it’s essential to understand what a SAR is, what activities can trigger these reports, and the potential legal consequences that may follow.

What is a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)?

A Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is a document that financial institutions are legally required to file with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) when they detect potentially suspicious behavior involving financial transactions. Once filed, these reports are sent to FinCEN, a division of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which shares the information with law enforcement agencies for further investigation if necessary.

The Truth Behind the TikTok “Free Money Hack” Trend: What You Need to Know

Published on: September 13, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

In the age of social media, viral trends come and go at lightning speed. Some are harmless and fun, but others can lead people into serious legal trouble. One of the most alarming trends recently circulating on TikTok is the so-called “free money hack.” This trend falsely promises easy money through exploiting banking loopholes, but what many don’t realize is that following such advice could land you in serious legal trouble.

What is the “Free Money Hack”?

The trend usually involves TikTok users claiming they have found ways to manipulate the financial system, offering viewers methods to “hack” or exploit bank accounts, cash apps, or credit systems to obtain free money. Some of these schemes involve:

Unregistered Securities and Allegations of Operating a Ponzi scheme

Published on: August 24, 2024 | By Conaway & Strickler, P.C.

The SEC recently filed a complaint against Todd Burkhalter and Atlanta-based Drive Planning LLC. It alleges that from 2020 through June 2024, $300 million was raised for purported real estate investments from over 2000 investors. It is alleged that the the money was instead misappropriated to fund Burkhalter’s “lavish lifestyle” (including a $3 million yacht) and to make Ponzi-lie payments.

He is charged with violating antifraud provisions of federal securities law. He may soon face DOJ charges as well. The antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws prohibit the use of fraudulent statements or schemes in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. These provisions apply to all securities transactions, including exempt transactions, and to statements made orally or in writing.

The primary anti-fraud statutory provision is Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which is codified in 15 U.S.C. § 78j. The SEC enforces this provision primarily through Rule 10b-5, which prohibits the use of any “device, scheme, or artifice to defraud”. Rule 10b-5 also imposes liability for any misstatement or omission of a material fact, or one that investors would think was important to their decision to buy or sell a security. A fact is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that the information would have been viewed by a reasonable investor as having significantly altered the total mix of information available.